On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Dale Puch <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I came up with a rare possibility for error. > The original "st something st" was manually expanded to "st something > street" your checking for a single st, and there would be. Or am I missing > another check?
It checks for one and ONLY one possible abbreviation to expand. If there are more than one it punts and ignores the way. This is a very conservative approach which is probably good at least for a first pass. Maybe if the first run goes well we can see how many problems are left and look at refining things for a second pass to catch more difficult ones. Or not... Toby _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
