On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's worth noting that any errors are already there as errors in the TIGER > tags. So, had the TIGER import been done properly in the first place, these > errors would be in the name tags as well.
This seems to be the case. The code checks for "tiger:name_base", and if it can't find it, then it doesn't make any changes. (Can someone confirm this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/16011770 will be untouched, right?) If so, this is good, but it does mean that road names are going to get out of sync, if, for instance, tiger:name_base was removed from some of the ways and not removed from others. This will complicate later fixes/enhancements. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
