You might check with the OpenSeaMap guys On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 5/16/2012 6:48 PM, Dale Puch wrote: > >> I found this at http://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.** >> mil/data/dictionary/ddnwn.htm<http://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.mil/data/dictionary/ddnwn.htm> >> Data is here >> http://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.**mil//db/waternet/data/<http://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.mil//db/waternet/data/>but >> not in shp format so someone would need to do some format translation. >> There are lots of other sets of data and perhaps one of those has >> something even more along the lines you want. >> > > Thanks for the link. I found it in shapefile format: http://www.bts.gov/** > publications/national_**transportation_atlas_database/**2011/<http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_atlas_database/2011/> > > So far the depths seem to jibe with other sources, and the "functional > class" looks like a good way to classify waterways, absent more specific > local regulations. > > > Any objections to continuing to use ship=yes for navigable waterways, and > a new deep_draft=* tag for ocean vessels? > -- Dale Puch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
