Thanks for looking at this. Yes, the disused=yes would probably catch a few, if and when I do another run on more recent data I will take it into account. The other ones would likely have been fixed since, I actually looked at a few of them in WA earlier tonight. Martijn
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Clifford Snow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> One thing I do not understand is why the script catches the false >> positive node 560176247 [1] (just an example, there are more like this >> one). >> Anyone with some SQL savvy care to look into that? >> > I looked at those in Western Washington but only one required fixing. Some > of the false positives were freeway links that are shown as disused=yes. > They were on freeways that abruptly ended. Adding in sql code to omit > disused=yes would catch some. Most of the other false positives were at > connections between motorway links and the main freeway. Not sure I > understand why. I couldn't see a pattern for those. Only one possibility > comes to mind - the nodes were connected after you grabbed the data. > > Clifford -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
