this one deleted the MV,SV border. not much damage otherwise http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11044834
The challenge with the other changeset is the size. analyzing the history is so hard. Reverting a whole changeset is very difficult with subsequent edits of others. There will be so many conflicts in that process that going forward things is often easier. especially some of these borders had been imported over each other and there is still duplicates and misaligned borders. I am not aware of a high quality set of city borders. The tiger borders are of very low quality and where possible I have aligned to the county borders. On Jun 8, 2012, at 4:13 PM, the Old Topo Depot wrote: > Thanks, Apollinaris, for the additional updates. BTW, what are the changeset > IDs that touched the other admin ways, please ? > > Further examination of changeset 11339421 reveals deletion of Sharon Heights > Golf Course, some surrounding ways, and other point features in the immediate > vicinity, including exit numbers on I-280, emergency call boxes, as well as > other features. See > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.4251091480255&lon=-122.214467525482&zoom=16 > > > It may be prudent to revert the entire changeset, given the number of > deletions contained, and the fact that this changeset is the only committed > by bxbreen (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bxbreen). Unfortunately, at > least the Sand Hill/I-280 interchange has been subsequently edited by others. > > Thoughts on how best to proceed are appreciated. > > Best, > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Apollinaris Schoell <ascho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > there is more damage to the borders in the area. I have removed some > duplicates for Menlo PArk now and fixed PA,EPA,MV,SV too. looks like another > pretty new user deleted even more boundaries. > > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:16 PM, the Old Topo Depot wrote: > >> It appears that changeset 11339421 deleted way id 108849539, which was a >> part of the Menlo Park admin boundary. As the changeset is rather large >> (2,304 nodes; 160 ways) a full revert seems undesirable. >> What might be the best way to recover the deleted way and restore the >> associated relation without attempting a full revert ? >> Thanks in advance, >> >> John Novak >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > > > > -- > John Novak >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
