Chris Lawrence-2 wrote > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2@> wrote: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=33.9958&lon=-81.1074&zoom=13&layers=M > > I've fixed up I-20 between the Columbia River and US 21; looks like > the damage goes both west and east from there at least to US 1 (west) > and I-77 (east) but I've got other things to do tonight so I can't fix > it all. >
I also started fixing the I-20 at the intersection to I-77, as the Interstate system around Columbia, South Carolina is a total mess. However, the I-77 north wards had so many issues, that I couldn't fix them all in a single pass. I decided to do some initial fixup along the I-77, leaving a number of intersections and the route relation broken. The question is, is it better to fix up a small bit thoroughly, or try and get as much of the interstate at least vaguely right as soon as possible, and leave the rest to a second pass? Unfortunately, I think I also ran into an editing conflict with you, as when I wanted to upload my changes, potlatch complained about version miss match on the I-20 relation. As I didn't know how to fix the conflict, I lost about 15 minutes worth of work trying to clean up the I-20 / I-77 intersection. So another question is, what is the best way to coordinate the general fixing of the interstate system to try and minimize editing conflicts? Kai -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Redaction-bot-is-heading-our-way-tp5717069p5717161.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
