> please no bulk upload. public data isn't always up to date and really needs > a review. if a trail is missing it's not a big deal when you have an > additional option. But if you plan a long hike and a trail is no passable > anymore it can be really dangerous. +1
>And special tags have to be verified on > the ground. There is no way to do that as an armchair mapper. essentially > quality is more important than quantity. Agreed! Didn't mean to imply that armchair mappers could/should be doing this, although I realize I wasn't clear. If we are going to work on improving trail data by building the community, working with hiking/biking/etc groups, improving tools (not sure if this is needed), then I recommend that tagging be at least a small part of the focus. As already observed, in many cases the trail geometry in OSM is already better than any other source. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
