Hi, Sorry to be late to chip in. I would keep CFCC. It's a good tag to have both to be able to generate statistics (how much of original TIGER class mapping remains intact?) as well as for reference; I find the CFCC classification is usually good - even if the mapping onto OSM k/v is sometimes unfortunate. In itself a reason to keep them, we may decide to bulk-retag based on cfcc in the future. Unlikely, but fathomable. The uuid can co as far as I am concerned. The tlid as well. County can be discarded under the assumption that we have nationwide county-or-equivalent boundaries (I actually don't know if that's the case, for Utah it looks complete). The zipcodes don't have an equivalent in OSM right now, and are useful for geocoding, so I'd say leave those untouched. The separated taga I have never found to be useful or reliable. My vote would be to remove those as well.
Looking forward to a leaner planet! Martijn > PS I find it very annoying that replies don't go back to the list by default You should check your email client settings. Sometimes posters explicitly set a reply-to field though - in that case, your reply will go to the person's email directly. I always do reply-all when replying to lists. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- martijn van exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
