On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:53 PM, AJ Ashton <[email protected]> wrote: > I've seen state parks in California that are in the database twice > each with slightly different tags. > Here is an example changeset that added two of everything: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2020128 > > Two relations containing the same way(s): one relation is > 'type=boundary, boundary=national_park' and the other is > 'type=multipolygon, leisure=park'. Are both of these really necessary? > To me it seems a bit redundant, especially when multiple relations are > involved. (Among other things it causes multiple results for the same > entity in Nominatum.)
Yes, this duplication is definitely bad. I also see an admin_level=4 on one set of relations which is also wrong as that is what we use for state borders. Toby _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
