On Sep 11, 2012 10:43 AM, "Richard Welty" <[email protected]> wrote:
> a lot of the tiger looks the same, but for some of the really awful
areas, tiger 2011/12 looks a great
> deal better. i'm planning on some selective replacement of unedited bad
tiger data with newer, better
> tiger in upstate NY as i find areas where tiger has improved a lot.

The greater Tulsa and Oklahoma City areas could probably be vastly improved
by this as well.
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to