We can solve the problem by sitting around waiting for it to happen, or forcing the issue by going and doing this. I suggest the latter is better :-)
Steve On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote: > PS: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Steve Coast <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian > > Personally I think it's brilliant you're working on this, and I'd love OSM to > work hand in hand to make it happen. Ideally I'd love OSM to be the > repository for this, it helps everybody. > > +1 to you working on this. Collecting parcels is a great idea! I started > doing this late last year and got this far: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsVnlPsfrhUIdEVZTzVFalFYYnlvTkc0R05wcUpsWVE#gid=0 > > I don't agree that OSM is the place it should go at this point. At the very > least we need to solve the data density problems in our editors/viewers and > the "area" data type problem. > > In my mind this would be better in a GitHub repo with {Geo|Topo}JSON files > for each county.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
