That sounds like a good idea to me. I want to be careful not to break anything.
Eric On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Richard Welty <[email protected]>wrote: > On 3/12/13 9:32 PM, Eric Fischer wrote: > >> Thanks for the helpful comments. At least anecdotally, I think I have >> actually seen the TIGER merge lead to more anomalies in gridded areas than >> in hills, maybe because people feel more comfortable making minor edits to >> mostly-regular grids. >> >> I completely agree that any new ways imported from TIGER will have to be >> reviewed manually, if for no other reason because they generally don't >> connect to any existing node. >> >> I am intending to produce the additions and adjustments as separate .osc >> files that can be examined for correctness in JOSM before being applied. >> Would people generally be comfortable with accepting node relocations that >> don't cause any ways to overlap themselves without extensive manual >> review, >> and only carefully reviewing additions? >> >> i think the best approach is to manually review early ones to develop > some > comfort level with the non-overlapping case. > > richard > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
