Kerry, On 06.06.2013 00:40, KerryIrons wrote:
It is not that these roads might be good bicycle routes or even that they are perhaps part of existing or proposed bicycle routes. But they are not approved US Bicycle Routes and therefore do not have a USBR route number. The maps show them as having a USBR route number. This is the only thing I am seeking to have corrected.
Yes, I think I misunderstood; I read "US bicycle routes" as a generic term ("a bicycle route in the US") when instead you meant "US Bicycle Routes" which is a certain kind of bicycle route that has one issuing authority behind it.
Of course it makes no sense to claim that something was an US Bicycle Route when it factually isn't.
This is what happens when one particpiates in discussions without the necessary background ;) Apologies!
Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
