re: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.81433&lon=-119.1004&zoom=17&layers=M
Back in November of 2010 AM909 mapped much of the McGill campground using amenity=parking and ref=SiteNumber to show individual campsites. See, for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/988132518/history This seems wrong to me. About like mapping each driveway in a subdivision with a parking icon. However I have not found a better solution on the wiki nor by searching taginfo. The closest I've come is this discussion on the talk-ca archives: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2010-August/003211.html with an example at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5500386 I like the idea of using addr:housenumber=SiteNumber but the use of addr:city=CampgroundName as well as addr:street=CampgroundName seems suspect to me. I think this was done so that the location could be searched for using geographic queries, but isn't that a bit like "tagging for the renderer"? What would be the best practice for this in the US? Thanks! _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
