On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been doing some California landuse and have come across a lot of > landuse=residential imported from FMMP which is clearly wrong. The > landuse=residential covers entire cities, including commercial, industrial, > retail, parks, schools, golf courses, airports, and pretty much anything > within city limits. Those landuse polygons are so hard to edit, so much clutter, interfere with editors. Ugh. Thanks for dealing with this. But if landuse is going to be in there, I'd prefer a stacked approach. Trying to seam a golf course landuse as a hole in a greater residential land use is a pain. Could we instead have a base landuse (e.g. residential) then simply overlay a more specific land use (e.g. golf course) with a priority or stacking layer, as in roads?
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
