It's not about mapping the sign, it's about mapping the neighborhood based on the sign.
We don't map speed limit signs, we map the speed limits on the roads based on the signs. We don't map interstate signs, we map the name of the interstate. We don't map individual trees, we map forests. We don't map "keep out, military area" signs, we map military areas. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Nathan Mills <nat...@nwacg.net> wrote: > >> The sort of signs in the link below are precisely the sort of thing we >> put in OSM, or at least have historically. >> https://www.cityoftulsa.org/**community-programs/** >> neighborhoods/neighborhood-**sign-guide.aspx<https://www.cityoftulsa.org/community-programs/neighborhoods/neighborhood-sign-guide.aspx> > > > There is certainly no problem mapping the *sign*. > The sign is verifiable & objective. > And the data is indexable and useful to map users, not just to mappers. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
