This warrants a wiki article!
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhau...@gmail.com>wrote: > Gave it a go, but still hasn't rendered correctly. Looks like there > might've been a separate relationship for each state's part of the lake and > they got broken somehow, probably in June. I deleted one relation (370016) > and consolidated ways into http://www.openstreetmap.org/?relation=370015 > The relationship looks good to me, but there must be something wrong > still. Unless someone else figures it out in the meantime, I'll try to > look at it OSM Inspector once it refreshes and identify what the remaining > issue is. > > Cheers, > Brad (aka neuhausr) > > ps--really fun topography to view! > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Russell Deffner <russdeff...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hello OSM-US,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I was looking at notes and saw one over by Lake Powell, I think someone >> was trying to adjust the shoreline and broke the relationship. Anyone >> listening who wants to try and fix? Here’s the general location: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=36.9979190826416&lon=-111.31210327148438&zoom=11 >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks, I don’t spend much time with water features and relationships;*** >> * >> >> =Russ**** >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > -- Elliott Plack http://about.me/elliottp
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
