On 10/15/13 8:01 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote: > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Las_Vegas> > > Defining an alt_name or loc_name of "Las Vegas" on each of the > surrounding CDP boundaries/relations may help Nominatim geocode these > cases better. But the CDPs are not part of the city (aside from any > areas that may have been annexed, which should be reflected in the new > TIGER 2013 boundaries) and should not be conflated with the city boundary. right. whatever gets done with boundaries should be done on something that at least tries to reflect facts, and not based on notions. that's why i suggested going to TIGER 2013 as, while it may not perfectly reflect the exact legal boundaries, it should be pretty close, as the Census Bureau does actually care about getting the headcounts right.
richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
