Anybody care about NHD tags???? The geometry is very rough on the import. I guess it's OK to delete the NHD tags while fixing up the geometry?
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jason Remillard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I came across my first NHD imported data set this weekend, in Western MA. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43638395 > > It has the following tags. > > NHD:ComID = 7711652 > NHD:FCode = 39004 > NHD:FDate = 1999/09/06 > NHD:FTYPE = LakePond > NHD:GNIS_ID = 00212194 > NHD:GNIS_Name = Lake Winnemaug > NHD:RESOLUTION = Medium > NHD:ReachCode = 01100005003135 > gnis:feature_id = 00212194 > name = Lake Winnemaug > natural = water > source = NHD > > The NHD wiki is pretty confusing. Is there is any kind of consensus on > how NHD data *should* look inside OSM? Should any of these NHD tags > even be maintained inside OSM? > > Also, the GNIS id is prefixed with 2 extra zero's. Is that OK, or > ideally would that be fixed too? > > Thanks > Jason. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
