I sent him a note back at the beginning of September concerning the problem. I don't think he's even worried about map rendering. I am guessing it is more about what he feels should be in the map. As a by product, I've seen landuses being removed too.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > Have you spoken with the offending mapper about your concerns? In > particular, I'd remind him of the maxim of "Don't torque the data for a > specific renderer." > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Greg Morgan <[email protected]>wrote: > >> So there is a fairly new mapper in the Phoenix area removing valid data. >> I would like advice on what to do. I don't to want dampen this mapper's >> efforts. However, another mapper has complained to me about the problem as >> this mapper has removed both of our work. Change set >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/18867333 is an example >> where CartoCrazy even uses a change set description of "Cleaned up >> clutter of pedestrian crossing markers,..." I am all for data revisions >> but this is an example of vandalism where the mapper doesn't realize that >> highway crossings are valid map data. The damage isn't limited to highway >> crossings. >> >> I could go and revert all of his change sets but that would start other >> problems. >> >> Please Advise, >> Greg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
