I'm willing to extend this to any route whose endpoints are undivided. Seems the problem we're ultimately dealing with are situations where a route ends with a median of some type. On Nov 18, 2013 2:42 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2013/11/18 Nathan Mills <[email protected]> > >> I'm still confused as to why the consumers of a relation can't use the >> forward/backward roles of the ways referenced therein rather than requiring >> completely separate relations. Why do we need two or more relations plus a >> super relation per road route even for undivided highways? Even for a >> somewhat experienced mapper like myself, it makes the editing process that >> much more error prone. > > > if the highway is never divided a single route would be sufficient (rather > hard to find this situation probably), but if you have routes that even for > a short way do not share the same geometry it will be easier to maintain > and to check if every direction has its own relation (and IMHO less error > prone). > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
