Richard Welty wrote: > Josh Doe wrote: > > I believe I saw SURFACE and CLUB which might be > > useful. > i'm not keeping any of it, the source tag points back to > the original data set and that should be sufficient. [...] > i don't know that i see a mapping from the AT surface > attributes to our surface tag, and an AT:surface tag > would be largely ignored by OSM users
If you can find a mapping from the Trail surface to OSM surface= tags, or even to tracktype= at a pinch, that'd be superb. I've just built a cycling router (using OSRM) and surface tags make _all_ the difference. They're something OSM greatly benefits from. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Completing-the-Appalachian-Trail-relation-tp5787477p5787521.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us