This seems to have some serious gaps in detail. For example, most of Portland and most of Tulsa is considered as having the same level of detail imagery available. Not so; I can barely make out centerlines and lane lines on the highest level of detail for the Tulsa area, whereas in Portland, I've read license plates on open trunk lids.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Clifford Snow <[email protected]>wrote: > Check out Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap, > http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/. Someone posted a > link about it on the Canadian talk list this morning. Another one of Martijn > van Exel great contributions to OSM. > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Alexander Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Mike N wrote: >> >> > In my part of SC, Bing imagery has updated! Seems to be from this >> > year; within the last month or so. >> >> New imagery in Fresno, too. When you're remapping rail yards, it's a >> lifesaver. >> >> Alexander >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> > > > > -- > Clifford > > OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
