Note that if you delete the node, the city name will no longer be rendered on osm.org or Mapquest Open. Not sure about other renderings but I'm guessing a lot of them do the same thing. Another way of fixing the nominatim problem is to create a boundary relation for the city. Move the tags from the way to the relation and then add the node to the relation with a role of "label" as this will cause nominatim to merge the two into a single entity while still rendering the name on the map.
Toby On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Richard Welty <[email protected]>wrote: > On 1/29/14 2:23 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > I generally copy the tags to the boundary (in JOSM copy the node, then > > paste tags into the way). > > The tiger and gnis tags do not overlap. The GNISID is a particularly > > useful tag to preserve. > gnisid may be the only one worth saving, most of the GNIS: tags are really > worthless. > > Town vs. City is a matter of opinion. You can visit the municipal > website > > and use whatever term they use more often. > > > > > er, no. depends on the state. in NY, town, city, village, hamlet, and > borough > all have very distinct legal meanings and there is no opinion about it. i > would not presume to judge these terms in CA. > > richard > > -- > [email protected] > Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting > OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux > Java - Web Applications - Search > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
