Phil, That's right. I would use unsigned_ref for county routes. In Baltimore County the county route numbers are never signed and not really even advertised. You'd have to look at SHA databases to figure out the ref. Here is an example using the proposed tagging (without using relations).
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21367512#map=17/39.41966/-76.62618 Elliott On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Phil! Gold <phi...@pobox.com> wrote: > * Elliott Plack <elliott.pl...@gmail.com> [2014-03-28 02:53 -0400]: > > Interesting note about this in Maryland. My friend Mike showed me that > some > > mappers have been using the *county* route numbers on some county roads > in > > Maryland. > > Since Maryland counties don't sign their route numbers[0], they're using > unsigned_ref=, not ref= in their way and route relation tagging, right? > > > [0] In any county I'm directly familiar with, at least; I don't go to > southern Maryland much, and I don't usually venture far outside the US > 50 corridor on the Eastern Shore. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- Elliott Plack http://about.me/elliottp
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
