You're probably right. Looking at the wiki for destination=, particularly the examples here http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination#Examples - it would be interesting to add control cities to the main motorway ways - has anyone already done this? I found a copy of the AASHTO list of control cities by Interstate here http://www.modot.org/business/manuals/Sign_Manual/APPENDIX%20B.pdf - not sure if it's the most recent.
Back on topic - Nobody feel strongly about exit_to versus destination for exits? I am inclined to go with exit_to for simplicity and because it's so much more widely used in the US.. On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Mike N <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/23/2014 7:16 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Mike N <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Most of this could be automatically converted to 'destination=', >>> except >>> that there is a growing dislike of any botlike edits. >> >> >> We should approach automated edits with a great deal of caution - but >> that's a separate discussion. I think converting exit_to to >> destination would be hard to do anyway because exit_to is added to the >> motorway_junction node, whereas destination is on a way. That could >> get ugly really fast, don't you think? > > > I haven't examined the destination tag, but just moving the information > from the node to the correct attached way would be straightforward. Of > course any non-regular cases could be flagged for manual work - such as > terminating in a Y with an exit_to:left and exit_to:right. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Martijn van Exel President, US Chapter OpenStreetMap http://openstreetmap.us/ http://osm.org/ _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
