On 2014-07-03 7:13 PM, Bill R. WASHBURN wrote:
I like how clearly you explain the differences. Since destination= is
so much more intuitive and so much more widely used, should we
depreciate exit_to, indicate on the wiki that exit_to is depreciated,
and make a concerted effort to migrate exit_to exits to destination=
exits?
I'm not sure how this migration would be anything other than a manual
process since we're moving from route numbers to destination names.
Well, in the case of a simple offramp it'll be the same information -
whatever is on the sign.
I believe some exit_to information was added without reference to any
form of ground truth but based on external sources, so checking the data
would probably be a good idea.
Here's a question (after a little explanation): in the example in your
diary entry, it appears that exit 91 splits into A and B after leaving
the motorway both from the east and west directions. It also appears
that the northbound ramps join together before merging with the
northbound motorway. The question is, would it be better to
add 180104293 to two relations for the northbound and southbound
destination= tags
There aren't any relations involved here.
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
