On 10/9/14 11:24 AM, Greg Morgan wrote:
I think this is still a question for the DWG. I agree that it would be great to look at case from a positive perspective. In that respect, It would have been great if they just added a poi for the business, address, etc However, when you look at the user page, http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Cheryl%20Daly, then you see that it was all about advertisement. Changing a street name to the person's name and business and using the change set description as yet another form of advertisement, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25304540, then you see it was nothing more than vandalism.
this incident is a small one that is on a path to easy resolution w/o DWG having to engage. i'm pretty sure the members of the DWG prefer it that way. the DWG is a big hammer, this incident does not require a big hammer. in general we should be very slow to invoke the DWG, and make an effort as members of the community to work through these things first. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
