OSM has the tag unsigned_ref to handle exactly this situation. There just isn't a wiki page describing it.
-jack On October 13, 2014 3:45:22 PM EDT, Dale Puch <[email protected]> wrote: >"US 52 FOLLOWS I 94" to me means they are concurrent, even if Minnesota >only has signs for I94 instead of I94/US52 >So it is a matter of presentation, not facts. > >Here in Florida there are places where most signs list only one name, >but >periodically there will be references to other names sharing the same >route. > >Dale > >Dale Puch > >On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Tom Fistere <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Hello! My name is Tom Fistere and I go by CountryLoon on OSM. After >> about a week of editing I thought I should throw out a couple of >questions >> and comments of what I am doing so far... >> >> I have started looking at the road typing throughout the state of >> Minnesota as it gives me an opportunity to study the status of the >map >> statewide. I see areas that are well documented and drawn and then >there >> are areas so neglected that the lines and imagery are needed some >immediate >> help. I invite anyone to check out my editing job on the segment of >MN 23 >> between St Cloud and Foley, MN as it was rebuilt to an expressway in >2013 >> and let me know how I did. >> >> A couple of questions, Minnesota hates concurrent highways. US 52 is >> concurrent with I 94 from St Paul, MN to Fargo, ND according to >AASHTO but >> MNDoT refuses to sign the routing beyond "US 52 FOLLOWS I 94" sign at >the >> interchange in St Paul. A similar thing occurs with US 12 through >the Twin >> Cities to the Wisconsin line. Should the map reflect the concurrency >or >> not? Google chose to do it but since it is unsigned, I lean toward >not >> showing it. >> >> Most of my information is coming from county GIS sites and DOT, are >there >> other other sites I should be checking into when looking for >information >> verification? So far my interest is in the road network but I am >willing >> to branch off into recreational trails and such in the future. >> >> Thanks! >> Tom >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Talk-us mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Typos courtesy of fancy auto-spell technology.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
