Hi,
Am 17.11.2014 14:21, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2014-11-14 21:44 GMT+01:00 tshrub <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Am 14.11.2014 19:15, schrieb Jack Burke:
What about submerged ones? Do we bother with those?
if we stumble over them, why not
and it sounds for my as if those
towns are still structures of reality
yes, another example is this one in Tuscany, It, which is normally
submerged in a lake, but will come to light every 10 years or so when
the lake is dried out for maintenance of the dam:
http://rete.comuni-italiani.it/foto/2009/61975
whow! What a crasy morbid scenery.
Situations like this:
http://www.gruene-bundestag.de/typo3temp/pics/e6d0cd2a32.jpg
are very different, in that nothing of the original landscape (or
village) remains (this is open pit mining of lignite in Saxony, Germany,
or more precisely a place called "Heuersdorf" close to the mine
"Vereinigtes Schleenhain" pic taken 09-02-2009). Another image here:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/display/17845958
The latter example shouldn't probably be mapped in OSM, as there is
literally nothing left now, while the former is still there, it is
simply degraded by the water and not visible most of the time due to the
lake.
as long as it exists. It could be a *barrier* for navigation. And (any
kind of) navigation is, where maps are for.
May be it emerges on the map every 10 years ;) No.
Here you might add an altitude-tag 'below', notice, etc.?
Generally if a structure is gone, I would delete it.
But (I think) the data alloyed into OSM's mind.
So may be in *future*, you can see a landscape-animation. That would be
funny.
best, t.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
