Toby, Thanks for assisting.
The aeroway-related tags exist on way 321010352 because my initial focus was to replicate the tags that existed on the ways that were accidentally deleted by chachafish. I didn’t agree with said tagging, but I felt removing those tags was for another changeset and discussion. Regarding the odd relation for 112849: Maybe this relation was remnants of an older import? It appears Chris Lawrence constructed it. Give him a shout maybe? That’s about it. Thank you again Toby! Best, Kristen --- Kristen Kam OSM Profile --> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/KristenK From: Toby Murray [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 9:44 AM Cc: Kam, Kristen; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Denver Area Relation Assistance I did a quick fix for the hole in the Denver, Denver County and Adams county relations. I may take another look at the area tonight. I saw a few oddities although I don't think they are related to your edit. I don't think way 321010352 should have aeroway tags on it since it is a member of a relation with those tags. There is also an odd multipolygon relation (112849) in the area that I suspect is mostly a duplicate of the Aurora boundary. Toby On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Jim McAndrew <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Kristen, If nobody else takes this on, I can look at it this weekend. -- Jim On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Kam, Kristen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Good Morning OSMers, A Telenav data integrity check picked up geometry issues associated with the Denver International Airport Route relation. We found that the culprit was the following changesets: * http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27705328 * http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27713462 I contacted the user who said essentially said the changesets were committed accidentally and didn't know how to reverse them. In any case, I reverted the deletions by creating _new_ OSM ways that are duplicates (tags & geometries) of the ways that were deleted. The two ways are: *Denver International Airport (321010352, v1) *321010349, v1 These new ways (321010352, 321010349) are duplicates of ways that were part of the following relations: *Adams County (1411346) *Denver County (1411339) *Denver (253750) *Denver International Airport (112192) I went ahead and added the new ways to the Denver International Airport relation member list. However, I am not very confident on reconstructing the other boundary relations' member lists. That said, I am writing to ask if anyone can pitch in on fixing the other four relations. Thank you in advance! Best, Kristen --- Kristen Kam OSM Profile → http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/KristenK _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
