> Am 24.04.2015 um 17:23 schrieb AJ Ashton <[email protected]>: > > Yes, if Lake Superior is mapped as natural=coastline (which I think is the > easier-to-maintain approach for such a large & complex water body) then we > should remove natural=water from the multipolygon relation (r4039486). Does > anyone have any objection to this? It's causing some noticeable rendering > issues both in the standard style and for data consumers. yes, if the coastline tag remains it seems logical to remove the natural=water tag. Semantically the coastline tag on a freshwater lake is clearly wrong, but it seems to be an accepted compromise in this case: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline#What_about_lakes.3F cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
