On 5/11/15 11:55 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > I agree, the historical boundary should be removed, but we need to be > sure to show what's in what state. It's quite a little mess. > > i think the only problem is that the word historical is there. deleting the tags on the way would be sufficient. the way itself is shared by a lot of boundary relations and should not be removed.
i have it loaded up in JOSM right now, but will refrain from uploading changes for the moment. i'll pull the trigger if there is a consensus. richard -- [email protected] Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
