The nodes w/ place names are good to have to support a healthy gazetteer function. Much harder to make a case for keeping CDP boundaries.
--SEJ Sent from my electronic tether. > On 2015年5月19日, at 20:47, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> wrote: > >> On 5/19/15 8:35 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: >> I would like to remove Machias, Washington admin_level 8 since it does not >> exist as a city in Washington. It has been there for a number of years >> apparently added by a bot. I plan to leave it as a CDP locality node. There >> doesn't seem to be any chance that it will become a city and will most >> likely be annex by Lake Stevens. >> >> Before I do I'd like to hear people opinion about deleting these >> admin_level=8 for CDP boundaries. > i think deleting CDP boundaries that don't make any sense is not unreasonable. > > i've deleted a couple on that basis. > > also, the boundary import that brought in the CDPs is kind of out of date; > the census bureau has updated quite a few of them, which i noticed while > cleaning up borders in eastern NY. > > they probably shouldn't be in an administrative boundary category anyway, > as they don't have any sort of local governance function. > > richard > -- > rwe...@averillpark.net > Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting > OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux > Java - Web Applications - Search > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
