Those all look fine, in that I wouldn’t change it if I saw it mapped that way.
I would expect any of these should be understood as a crosswalk by data consumers: highway=footway, footway = crossing highway=cycleway, cycleway = crossing highway=path, path = crossing You could read this (but it’s kind of a mess imo): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dcrossing <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=crossing> > On Jun 23, 2015, at 4:35 PM, Jim McAndrew <[email protected]> wrote: > > Paul, Bryan, > > Thanks for your help with this! My issue was with bicycle trails that cross > roads, as they usually put a crosswalk in for these cases, but the route > itself can support other non-motorized vehicles. I think this gives me some > good options that would be acceptable. > > 1) I could use highway=footway, footway=crossing, bicycle=yes -- which is a > little misleading, but could make sense > > 2) I could also use highway=path, crossing=yes, bicycle=yes -- this seems > better to me, but I don't know if it's acceptable to use crossing without > "connecting" it to a value > > -- > Jim > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Bryan Housel <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > It’s ok to map them as either a single intersection node or a way. Here is > my understanding from the various wiki pages the document these things, and > it matches what I see people map in places with sidewalks and crosswalks. > Keep in mind, the wiki does seem to change kind of frequently, and in my > opinion there are too many extra detail crosswalk tags that just aren’t used > in practice. > > If mapping only the intersection node, `highway=crossing` on that node is > enough. If you want to add detail, `crossing=zebra` for a typical striped > crosswalk, or `crossing=*` for whatever other kind of crosswalk people can > dream up (there are plenty, see wiki). > > If mapping the crosswalk as a way, I map the node as above, and also map the > way that crosses the street as `highway=footway + footway=crossing`. Again > you can add `crossing=zebra` or `crossing=*` for more detail. These don’t > conflict with anything, as the ends of the crosswalk typically join up with a > `highway=footway + footway=sidewalk`. > > iD currently only has a zebra crossing preset, and I think I’m going to add > an unmarked crossing preset also, following discussion on HOT list. > > Thanks, Bryan > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Jim McAndrew <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I am looking into tagging some crosswalks, and I've just been putting a > > node at the intersection. Some crosswalks are really long though, and I > > think that information is important to the person crossing the road. Is > > there an acceptable way that we can tag a way as a crosswalk without > > interfering with its other tags (ex: highway=crossing on a way could > > interfere with a tag like highway=path). > > > > I'd love to hear everyone's opinion on what we can do or why we shouldn't > > try this. > > > > -- > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-us mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
