On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote:
> I didn't want to make the instructions too convoluted. We can always > go back in and manually check for these 'unjoined crossings'. I am > just mentioning it here because there's a lot of more experienced > mappers here. > The instructions are fine. Most of what I've found are false positives and crossings that need railway=level_crossing. Most that needed the level_crossing are unconnected although not all. A few were missing the street/footway/track and some are now bridges. We still need to do a lot of work on streets in rural areas. I've ended up fixing a few in order to add the crossing. Would be nice if a company were to offer some "prize" for getting this completed. Union Pacific is pushing for rail crossing safety. We should consider approaching UP and BN for some incentives for getting people to map crossings. Martijn, you have more experience with offering prizes, what is your take? -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
