That is possible. And a fix in Osmand is relatively easy (edit routing.xml to set the assumed/default *_link speed to about 1/2 that of the assumed/default speed of associated non-link way). Can be further improved by setting all the assumed speeds to match the real world defaults in your part of the US. However that solution has been posted several times on the Google Groups page for Osmand and has not been acted on. My last couple of suggestions, along with pull requests with working changes, have been rejected by the Osmand team so they apparently feel differently about a number of things than I.
If this is mapping for the router then it is just as bad as mapping for any other data consumer (renderer). Cheers! Tod > On Oct 13, 2015, at 4:51 PM, Russ Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Paul Johnson writes: >> Not looking at this specific example, I might consider a a split to >> multiple roadways between the medians and a potential downgrade to >> motorway_link for gates that expect you to stop (such as cash/coin gates >> versus ETC gates) or are primarily used to toll an offramp/onramp pair of >> teapot handle ramps. > > Is he possibly trying to get OSMAnd (and other routers) to route you > through the main highway? I've seen it do some funky things, like > route you down an exit ramp, through the main road there, and back up > the entrance ramp onto the highway. > > -- > --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com > Crynwr supports open source software > 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 > Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
