On 3/24/2016 5:50 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It is obvious to me that all occurrences of highway=social_path need to
be replaced with whatever they were before. I'd normally say let's give
them some time to come up with a better idea but seeing that the problem
has been highlighted to them pretty much at the time they made the edits
5 months ago, and they haven't come up with a better idea, I'd say the
time is up now.

After talking to some others involved and the talk-us@ discussion, it's reasonably clear that this is another of those cases where a path exists but the property owner or government doesn't allow access, and there's a well established way of tagging that: access=no, and I've tagged the paths accordingly.

If someone is unhappy with how access=no is rendered on a particular map or router, they should raise it on the issue tracker of that style or router profile. Complaints on a local list will not make it to the developers of most styles.

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to