I commented on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43314846 a few
days ago - does landuse=forest really make sense there?
For more details on the relation see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1447414#map=15/47.9626/-120.2074
and http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=1447414 .
All I know of the area is"lots of parts of it do have lots of trees",
but does the landuse=forest assignment make sense on the National Forest
boundary, or should it be on the forested areas within? I mention this
here rather because I'm sure there are people here familiar with the
area, which I'm not.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
