On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Albert Pundt <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know that north/south/east/west directions are preferred for relation > roles of one-way route segments (e.g. one-way pairs or divided highways), > but what about clockwise and counterclockwise? Often beltways, like D.C.'s > Capital Beltway, are signed such that they abruptly go from north/south to > east/west, but then you have routes like Pittsburgh's Belt System, where > the Belts aren't signed with directions at all. These seem to be given "CW" > (clockwise) and "CCW" (counterclockwise) roles. Is this correct, or does > "forward" or some other role need to be used? > Always use forward/backward as the role if the member is a way. Always use a cardinal or clockwise/anticlockwise for the role on a route master when the members are relations. Trying to use anything other than forward/backward on ways makes routes an extraordinary pain in the butt if not unmaintainable.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
