I can clean it up (manually), if everybody agrees. * remove small polygonal driveways * convert larger polygonal highways to actual highways where appropriate
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:27 AM Tod Fitch <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 22, 2017, at 4:59 AM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mar 22, 2017 7:49 AM, "Paul Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Eric Ladner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/33.74152/-116.29677 > > So much wrongness.. I don't even know where to start in describing it. > > > This really "feels" like a botched import that has the potential to > become something actually good. I've reached out. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38292137 > > > I noticed this yesterday when working on broken relations... It doesn't > look like an import (mostly because they used iD and the digitization looks > like hand drawn iD) but the tagging doesn't look right. I'd say it's a > mapping project (they called it a "draw party") with good intentions but > that might need some tagging cleanup. > > > At least the stuff I first notice looking at that in JOSM (highway=* drawn > as polygons without an area tag and also including a landuse=residential) > are from single commits from a mapper that was active for several months a > few years ago. Change set claims source is Bing. Sounds like a well meaning > but flawed contribution by a new mapper who has now moved on from OSM. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
