Jochen thanks for taking the lead on this issue!

I just wanted to add for anyone working on this effort, old-style multipolygons 
will render a bit differently in iD soon.
They will have little gaps along the edge, screenshot here:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3908#issuecomment-296041755 
<https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3908#issuecomment-296041755>

Anyone who is interested in trying out this new version of iD can do so here:
http://preview.ideditor.com/master/ <http://preview.ideditor.com/master/>
(And please report any issues that you find: 
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues 
<https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues> )

If you are looking for old-style multipolygons to clean up, head over to my 
home state of New Jersey, which is full of them.
As a bonus, many of them are also tagged with the deprecated `landuse=farm`. :)

Thanks, Bryan



> On Apr 21, 2017, at 3:40 AM, Jochen Topf <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> as some of you might have seen we have a huge effort going on to fix
> broken multipolygons and re-tag old-style multipolygons (those where the
> tags are on the outer way(s) instead of on the relation) into the
> current style.
> 
> You can read all about it on http://area.jochentopf.com/ .
> 
> As you can see on the map at http://area.jochentopf.com/map/index.html
> most of the old-style multipolygons now left are from some large-scale
> imports, including some in the US. We need your help in cleaning this
> up! I you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
> 
> Jochen
> -- 
> Jochen Topf  [email protected]  https://www.jochentopf.com/  +49-351-31778688
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to