On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Kevin Kenny <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> So we're ignoring that nodes don't inherit the directionality of the >> underlying way? Really sounds like you're trying to suggest using >> direction=forward/backwards when a relation is what's actually needed. >> > > There are already tens of thousands of STOP signs tagged with direction=*. > The semantics don't imply that a node has a direction. > How does it not? A node doesn't infer a way that it's attached to, though a node may infer what nodes it crosses through. This is why relations became a thing, to model things that can't be inferred from the other two primitive types, particularly for enforcement and turn restrictions. > Have you even posted a proposal for the relation-based schema that you're > advocating? You sent a link when we had this discussion before, but the > link went to a page about traffic cameras that had no mention of STOP or > GIVE WAY signs at all. > I seem to recall there was an offer to put together the write-up out there since my mediawiki-fu is rather awful. If someone would like to help on that, that'd be awesome.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
