For the ‘dashed line’ center turn lanes: what you do makes sense to me too. I have used center_turn_lane=yes in the past, but that is not documented and I wouldn’t encourage it. This way it fits nicely into the lanes schema.
The turn lanes plugin seems to support this nicely: https://www.dropbox.com/s/8wmp5h2cn931pic/Screenshot%202017-06-19%2014.33.40.jpg?dl=0 — even though the center lane is rarely marked with left turn arrows, as suggested by the turn lane style. Martijn > On Jun 19, 2017, at 5:20 AM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > In this case, with the dual-direction turn lane, I would label that with > lanes:both_ways=1 and turn:lanes:both_ways=left. If the center lane has two > solid lines (making it a flush median), then lanes:both_ways=1 and > access:lanes:both_ways=no > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Horea Meleg <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hello all, > > Me and my Telenav colleagues are editing lane numbers in Detroit area. We > found some cases that looks like this (42.43651692568901, -83.51102781049859): > > <image001.jpg> > > Our question is: what is the central lane used for and how do we map it? > > Should we count it as a separate lane and have 3 lanes in this case (one for > each direction and one for both directions) > > <image002.png> > > or have only 2, one for each direction? > > <image003.png> > > > > Thank you, > > Horea Meleg > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
