I don’t have direct knowledge of I-69 but the numbering on the Interstate system has odd numbers for north-south routes, so having all of I-69 in north and south relations seems correct to me.
I have seen area where due to topography long stretches of north-south road actually go east-west. I’ve also seem areas were US numbered highways end up with an opposite compass bearing (i.e. the north bound direction on the highway is actually going south). Just because a section of the route is going in a different direction than the overall route is not a reason to separate it out of the route relation. That is, the route relation should match the official highway direction. Cheers, Tod > On Sep 21, 2017, at 7:26 PM, Dave Mansfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I-69 in Michigan is east / west from where it splits from I-96 near Lansing > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/42.7761/-84.6325 > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/42.7761/-84.6325> to where it ends in > Port Huron. It is part Relations that are north and south. > > I would like to fix it but I don’t have a lot of experience with relations so > I thought I should ask first. Would it be correct to remove the section that > is east and west from the north and south relations and create new relations > for east and west? > > Thank You > Dave > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us>
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
