Yes, it'd be great to do this. I started a project to track open road centerlines like this on GitHub here: https://github.com/osmlab/centerlines
In theory, we could download that data and then do the same process using the presumably higher quality road data. On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Joe Sapletal <joe.saple...@charter.net> wrote: > This is really cool. Can I suggest for the Twin Cities metro area someone > doing something similar with the Metro Regional Centerlines Collaborative > Local Centerlines (MRCC)? I know that Dakota County hasn’t submitted > centerlines to Tiger in a couple of years, but will be for the next > update. Not sure about the other counties though. There very well may be > areas that the MRCC will be a better source than the Tiger data. > > > > https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metrogis-trans-mrcc-centerlines > > > > Joe > > > > *From: *Ian Dees <ian.d...@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:25 AM > *To: *Badita Florin <baditaflo...@gmail.com> > *Cc: *talk-us@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap <talk-us@openstreetmap.org> > *Subject: *Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a > automatedway. > > > > It would be interesting to see what differences CYGNUS would turn up. What > would the output of CYGNUS be? > > > > I put together the TIGER 2017 layer that's in the editors right now. I'll > work on writing up how I did it later today. > > > > Basically: I used tiger-tiles (https://github.com/iandees/tiger-tiles) to > generate a vector tiles database with expanded road names from TIGER 2017. > Then I downloaded an osm-qa-tiles (https://osmlab.github.io/osm-qa-tiles/) > file for the United States and ran osmlint's tigerDelta ( > https://github.com/osmlab/osmlint/tree/master/validators/tigerDelta) to > find the segments that had different geometry. The output was then ran > through Tippecanoe to generate a vector tileset and posted to Mapbox as the > low zoom red features. > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Badita Florin <baditaflo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, i wanted to ask if there will be interest around comparing TIGER 2017 > with what we have in OSM, using CYGNUS, in a automated way. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/36746 > > > > On top of cygnus, i have developed shgp2cygnus, were you can place any > shapefile, any size, you provide a translation file, and, in the end, you > get a list with all the ways that are in the TIGER dataset, but not in OSM. > > This would be something useful for the community ? > > > > I don`t know if somebody is already doing something similar, or what is > the status ? Were can i read more ? > > I knoiw that the TIGER 2017 Overlay in JOSM shows in red the roads that > are not in OSM, but are in TIger 2017. > > But I don`t know were to read more, and if the data is accessible to > download directly, not just show as a WMS Layer. > > > > It will take around 7-14 days to process all USA” > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
