On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details > > A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county > information. I've eliminated all objects that have been reported to be > ok, and plan to remove or change the names on these remaining ones. (To > avoid misunderstandings: There's a column in the file that says what I > plan to do, either "change to XYZ" or "delete", but that does NOT mean > "delete the object", just "delete the name tag"!)
Thanks for taking care of this. Could I make a suggestion for future work of this kind: add a note:redaction (or some similar key) with value identifying the particular redaction that the object belongs to? At Max's suggestion, I was doing Overpass queries with the set of way ID's looking for ones that were still last modified by 'woodpeck_repair', but I realize that if the ways had an identifiable tag, I could easily hack up a reusable script to say, "give me the next object from this redaction" - and remove the tag when the object is re-uploaded. Simply having a tag like "note:redaction=chdr_20171008" on the redacted way would do it. I may be too much of an old woman here, worrying about identifying objects from the wrong repair. It appears that for this particular incident, way(newer:"2017-10-07T00:00:00Z")(user:"woodpeck_repair")({{bbox}}); is a perfectly workable Overpass query for "tell me the work to do in this particular bbox". With that in hand, I can probably finish up New Jersey this week. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us