Hi everybody! Please remember to stay on topic and friendly. This thread seems to be drifting off into a discussion about the merits of OSM editors.
Also remember that long replies tend to result in people talking past one another. Short, sweet, and to the point helps a conversation stay on topic. -Ian Your friendly talk-us moderator On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20/11/2017 19:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >> Come on, JOSM itself is difficult, but everyone >> who groked JOSM, never returns to Potlach. >> > > Untrue. Each of the OSM editors has strengths and weaknesses - it's > simply a case of finding the best tool for the job. In some cases that > might be JOSM; in some cases it might be something completely different > (StreetComplete?). JOSM isn't the best at everything - it has a user > interface out of the fifth circle of hell and seems intent on dragging the > user straight back there. It fails with some stuff that is "basic" to e.g. > Potlatch (mapping with waypoints recorded with information in them as you > go for example). See questions such as https://help.openstreetmap.org > /questions/7675/josm-is-it-possible-to-convert-an-individual > -waypoint-in-a-gpx-file-to-a-node for a bit more discussion on that. > > Best Regards, > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us