I found a case[0] where the name is definitely legitimate, so I added a warning to double check with available street level imagery, plus an example to the challenge instructions.
Martijn [0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33991781 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33991781>, and see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=shRl1-KeI59im7hZSmsJig&lat=40.21940429158758&lng=-79.60234247987415&z=17&x=0.6058084012090132&y=0.35483101059177824&zoom=2.2895309990765194 <https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=shRl1-KeI59im7hZSmsJig&lat=40.21940429158758&lng=-79.60234247987415&z=17&x=0.6058084012090132&y=0.35483101059177824&zoom=2.2895309990765194> > On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I created a MapRoulette challenge to review named junction nodes. Since named > junctions are very uncommon, most of these should probably be edited. There’s > only a few hundred of them so we should be able to review these together > pretty quickly. > > https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3253/task/5881462 > <https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3253/task/5881462> > > (I also wrote a post on how to create challenges in the new MapRoulette > because some things have changed / are new: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/46863 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/46863> ) > > Let me know if this makes sense to review! > > Martijn
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
