If it is a peak then ele=XXX and noname=yes would be OK. If it is not a peak it should not be present at all - otherwise it opens way to importing LIDAR data into OSM (and there are datasets with resolution of 5 cm, dumping it into OSM would be case of unverifiable data making it impossible to edit).
I opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1703462 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1703462> to reduce chance that it will be discussed and forgotten. If this is really used name - then it would be OK but my bet is that this is not an actually used name. Mar 7, 2019, 7:04 PM by [email protected]: > It seems that there are a couple of mappers in Colorado US (at least, perhaps > mapping in other areas as well) who are adding spot elevations (presumably > from USGS Topo maps) to OSM tagging them as > natural=peak > name=Point (elevation in feet) > > For example: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4601119717 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4601119717> > > What does the community think about this? > > natural=peak might be ok if said spot elevation is really a local high point > (some are not). The name I am less sure of. If this belongs on the map at > all, it should probably have an ele tag, with value in meters. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
